BJYDesigns Solutions Firm Los Angeles, California

Resources:SEO company India

I’m not a truly professional designer of Broadband India Bsnl , far from that. I work on embarqued systems , a univers where pretty interfaces are the least of our worries for louisville web design; Kentucky Internet Marketing. (which might explain why your trading automate’s interface is soooo 90’s of Watch Castle)

I’m working on a MMORPG Server project that includes Work from home, web design, Mailing List , and had to design the best online game site myself because in the case where’ id get the prestations of a designer , i figured he’d have a lot of trouble finding the right resources unlike me who is initiated here rapid prototypes with Wedding Favors; Candle Wedding Favors; Beach Wedding Favors

…..
.

So i took my courage in my hands and went in free online Spanish dictionary.

After strugling with PS3, i got this result : http://valiantro.com

Please tell me how i can improve image hosting sites:

are there any mistakes misplaced things ? Maybe elements that should be changed moved for a more attractive design ?

Should i make the layout generally smaller ?

Are the fonts i used any good in Watch Castle ?

How can i handle the content better ?

are there any possible modifications i can do on the footer?

Make your buttons a lil bit smaller. The layout is fine and the elements are well placed, it’s attractive for me as an MMORPG player. The banner image is to larger though. You can put links in your footer and make it wider, lessen the height.

In line with what Thompson said, I think you could exploit better the screen space, resizing some things to make them smaller. For example, there are gaps that could be narrowed. Almost everything gives the impression to be oversized. However, I am not a gamer, and I just have a 19″ screen.

We all know the theory behind GIF, JPG or PNG. When to use them or how to use them. But there is hardly any literature available of what happens when they are uploaded on to web of Web Design India with Cat Urine Removal Product.

When you are working with ad banners you will have to often use photographic images and flat colors as a combination. If you save the files as JPG and upload them to web, the flat colors in the images in the web page get pixellated. Reverse thing happens when image is saved as GIF and uploaded to web.

For long we faced this problem at http://www.upto75.com. Then on one fine day we just experimented with PNG format and the images are just working fine. The quality of images has gone up tremendously when seen in a web page. Earlier the quality of images was horrendous.

I am not sure if this is common knowledge among the designer and web community. I felt it is worth to share this piece of information.

Let me know if you too faced this problem and how did you solve it.

I heard that PNG is a format to be used on the Web, but each time I try to use this format I find that image files are greater that the alternatives using GIF or JPG. Could you explain if there is any advantage in using PNG besides what you already said? But we never faced a big problem in increase of file size. Lot of times we found them to be smaller than JPG.

PNG is great IF you know how to use it - and frankly it’s not the be-all end-all solution since it’s compression on 24 bit images can quite often be a total joke.

I wouldn’t brag about that given that your site is a whopping 365k after compression (and an ungodly 641k uncompressed - christ got enough javascript in there?!? of course 116k of markup for 10k of content says it all) in 45 files - as evidenced by the 30 seconds or so it’s taking for the page to download when I’m on a 22mbps connection (or is it just your server is being choked out on transmitting and compressing that much stuff?)

What you are calling pixelation, at least so far as jpegs are concerned, is called artifacting, the amount of artifacting being ENTIRELY controlled by how much compression you set on the image.

Read more…